|Open letter Prime Minister Trudeau industrial wind turbines July11 2016 and Appendix 1_44 new names
Posted: 16 Oct 2016 05:51 PM PDT
Download pdf file
Please acknowledge receipt of this letter.
The Rt. Hon. Justin Trudeau Prime Minister of Canada Office of the Prime Minister 80 Wellington Street Ottawa, ON K1A 0A2 email@example.com
The Hon. Dr. Jane Philpott Minister of Health, Canada House of Commons Ottawa, Ontario, CanadaK1A 0A6 Hon.Jane.Philpott@Canada.ca
Mr. Paul Glover Associate Director of Health 350 Albert Street, Suite 1210 Ottawa Ontario, Canada K1R 1A4 firstname.lastname@example.org
June 15, 2016 Copy sent by mail
Dear Prime Minister Justin Trudeau, Minister Dr. Jane Philpott, Assoc. Deputy Minister Paul Glover;
We have included Associate Deputy Minister Glover in this letter because he met with Dr. Robert McMurtry, F.R.C.S.(C), F.A.C.S. and researchers Carmen Krogh, BSc Pharm and Beth Harrington, BMus in July 2009 where he was made aware of the suffering that was already taking place in rural Ontario as a result of wind turbine installations.
Your Government has committed to listen to the people of Canada with respect to climate change. Mr. Trudeau’s Open Letter to Canadians dated November 4, 2015 states: “Our country faces many real and immediate challenges – from a struggling middle class to the threat of climate change. If we are to overcome these obstacles, Canadians need to have faith in their government’s honesty and willingness to listen. That is why we committed to set a higher bar for openness and transparency in Ottawa.” 
We wish to take this opportunity to help you realize a safe approach to your climate change goals.
During the past eight years, the steady expansion of industrial wind technology as a source of clean energy for Canadians has resulted in adverse health events in affected communities in Canada. [2,3]
Many in Ontario and elsewhere have logged serious health complaints with proponents/operators of wind turbine projects, provincial and federal government ministries as well as wind turbine manufacturers. These serious health complaints are a result of the harmful acoustical waves and radio/electromagnetic energy emitted by industrial wind turbines which are located in proximity to homes. As previous ministers and current Minister Philpott have been informed, the adverse effects of wind turbines are not trivial.
HEALTH CANADA’S WIND TURBINE NOISE AND HEALTH STUDY DESIGN
Some parents and commentators have advised Health Canada about their concerns for their children. Yet Health Canada excluded children under 18 in its WTNH study.  This exclusion has resulted in an unassessed cluster of a vulnerable young population.
As a result of the random selection process, we also note that 93 homes where elderly members of the community lived, were coded “out of scope” because the study subject was over 79 years of age. Despite the fact that it is recognized Canada has an aging population, this vulnerable population cluster was also not assessed. 
In addition, it appears that Health Canada’s WTNH study did not establish pre-turbine baseline objective measurements to be compared with the measurements taken during the study. Indicators such as cortisol, blood pressure and highly disruptive sleep patterns (HDS) before and after exposure to wind turbines are crucial to assessing true health outcomes. The study design could have included objective measurements in zones where wind turbines were operating, removing the individual(s) from wind turbine exposure for a period of time (30 days or more), followed by a reassessment of the complainant upon return.
We question why Health Canada – when it had the opportunity – did not conduct individual investigations of the actual complaints rather than a stated randomized epidemiological study of a broad population while excluding children under 18 and the elderly over 79. Investigations of specific complaints are far more revealing than randomized selection. The Government of Canada had been made aware of the health issues. During the study design phase those raising health issues were not given the opportunity to be represented on the design committee in order to share collective knowledge and expertise about living with IWTs on a daily basis. During the comments phase, requests to be included in the research were dismissed by Health Canada on the basis that these individuals could be considered biased.
HEALTH CANADA’S WTNH STUDY
The study was a stated cross-sectional randomized epidemiological study under the former government and it concluded revealed that high annoyance as a result of wind turbine emissions was “statistically significant”. 
High community annoyance leads to a myriad of health outcomes including stress related symptoms such as chronic sleep disturbance, elevated blood pressure, cardiac events and depression. This is expressed in the WHO Lares study which studied the effects of noise on children:
One of the main conclusions of this work is that for noise induced sleep disturbances, traffic noise annoyance and neighbourhood noise annoyance, the identified health effects are independent of socioeconomic status and housing conditions. The elevated relative risks are expressed in the cardiovascular system, the respiratory system and the musculoskeletal system, as well as through depression.  [Emphasis added]
Annoyance is defined as a feeling of discomfort which is related to adverse influencing of an individual or a group by any substances or circumstances. Annoyance express itself e. g. by malaise, fear, threat, trouble, uncertainty restricted liberty experience, excitability or defencelessness. With chronically strong annoyance a causal chain may exist between the three steps health – annoyance – disease.
The World Health Organizations comments on children and their vulnerability to noise:
VULNERABLE GROUPS OF CHILDREN The fetus and babies Preterm, low birth weight and small for gestational age babies Children with dyslexia and hyperactivity Children on ototoxic medication 
Children, noise and health Impairment of early childhood development and education caused by noise may have lifelong effects on academic achievement and health. Studies and statistics on the effects of chronic exposure to aircraft noise on children have found:
Consistent evidence that noise exposure harms cognitive performance; consistent association with impaired well-being and motivation to a slightly more limited extent; moderate evidence of effects on blood pressure and catecholamine hormone secretion 
RADIATION EMITTING DEVICES ACT
Consumer and Clinical Radiation Protection Bureau (CCRPB)
Though Health Canada’s WTNH study was called a randomized epidemiology study, Health Canada’s preliminary results state something different and clarified that results cannot be generalized beyond the sample locations studied. 
The Radiation Emitting Devices Act [REDA] is the federal law under which Health Canada’s approximately $2.2m research was conducted. The REDA specifically states that radiation is a form of acoustical waves.
(b) creates a risk to any person of genetic or personal injury, impairment of health or death from radiation by reason of the fact that it (i) does not perform according to the performance characteristics claimed for it, (ii) does not accomplish its claimed purpose, or (iii) emits radiation that is not necessary in order for it to accomplish its claimed purpose, the person shall forthwith notify the Minister. 
The REDA states the device [wind turbine] must comply with the standards prescribed and that the Minister is to be notified of non-compliance or defect and may investigate. However according to Access to Information and Privacy [ATIP] requests of at least 10 wind projects, not one importer/proponent/operator or manufacturer has reported complaints to the Minister from the population as required by the REDA.
Through the collaborative efforts of Canadian standardization network members, standardization is helping to advance the social and economic well-being of Canada and to safeguard the health and safety of Canadians. The network’s efforts are overseen by SCC. The principal objectives of SCC are to foster and promote voluntary standardization as a means of advancing the national economy, supporting sustainable development, benefiting the health, safety and welfare of workers and the public, assisting and protecting the consumer, facilitating domestic and international trade, and furthering international cooperation in relation to standardization. [Emphasis added]
Exposure to wind energy installations has been imposed without consent on many rural residents including those who have signed this letter. Chronic exposure without remedy to the emissions from wind turbines has caused a deleterious loss of well-being and damage to health and safety.
When it comes to industrial wind turbines, federal and provincial authorities have a poor track record in protecting our physical and mental health, social well-being and safety.
We therefore want investigations of each of our situations through patient-oriented research such as is provided by Health Canada under the SPOR Strategy for Patient-Oriented Research.
conducted by multidisciplinary teams in partnership with relevant stakeholders, aims to apply the knowledge generated to improve healthcare systems and practices. 
On March 31 2016, $12.5 million was granted to McMaster for research on patient oriented research. It reiterated the role of patient oriented investigative research that focuses on individual patients.
Patient-oriented research refers to investigation that engages patients as partners, puts a focus on patient-identified priorities and improves patient outcomes. This research, conducted by multidisciplinary teams in partnership with relevant participants, aims to apply the knowledge produced to improve healthcare systems and practices. 
On May 2, 2016 Dr. Philpott granted $2 million to University of Toronto to investigate environmental factors’ impacts on health. Again, the focus is on investigation.
Four researchers at the University of Toronto and its affiliated research centres are receiving $2million each to investigate how environmental factors can impact health. The funding from the Canadian Institutes of Health Research was announced today by federal health minister, the Honourable Jane Philpott. 
These grants support the benefit of investigating how environmental factors impact patient outcomes which wind turbine-affected communities did not receive through Health Canada’s WTNH study.
On behalf of:
1. Prime Minister Justin Trudeau’s open letter to Canadians (4 November 2015) http://pm.gc.ca/eng/news/primeminister-justin-trudeaus-open-letter-canadians#sthash.CbEutQbQ.dpuf
4. Health Impacts and Exposure to Wind Turbine Noise: Research Design and Noise Exposure Assessment. http://www.hc-sc.gc.ca/ewh-semt/consult/_2012/wind_turbine-eoliennes/research_recherche-eng.php
5. Health Canada Environmental and Workplace Health, Frequently Asked Questions November 6, 2014 http://www.hc-sc.gc.ca/ewh-semt/noise-bruit/turbine-eoliennes/faq-eng.php
6. Michaud D et al. Exposure to wind turbine noise: Perceptual responses and reported health effects. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 139 (3), March 2016
7. Health Canada: Summary of results http://www.hc-sc.gc.ca/ewh-semt/noise-bruit/turbine-eoliennes/summaryresume-eng.php
8. World Health Organization. LARES Final report Noise effects and morbidity By: Dr Hildegard Niemann / Dr Christian Maschke Interdisciplinary research network. Noise and Health 2004 http://www.euro.who.int/__data/assets/pdf_file/0015/105144/WHO_Lares.pdf
10. World Health Organization, Noise Facts and Figures, Sited December 23, 2012, http://www.euro.who.int/en/what-we-do/health-topics/environment-and-health/noise/facts-and-figures
11. ERT Case Nos. 13-084/13-085/13-086/13-087/13-088/13-089. Ontario Environmental Review Tribunal. Ryan Dixon v MOE. Transcript Dr. David Michaud, October 4, 2013 p. 17
12. Health Canada. Environmental and Radiation Health Sciences Directorate (ERHSD) Date Modified: 2007-03-28. http://www.hc-sc.gc.ca/ahc-asc/branch-dirgen/hecs-dgsesc/erhsd-dsser/index-eng.php
13. Health Canada: Summary of results http://www.hc-sc.gc.ca/ewh-semt/noise-bruit/turbineeoliennes/summary-resume-eng.php
14. Radiation Emitting Devices Act (R.S.C., 1985, c. R-1) Act current to 2016-05-12 and last amended on 2004-10-13 http://laws-lois.justice.gc.ca/eng/acts/R-1/
15. Government of Canada. Canadian Institutes of Health. Research Strategy for Patient-Oriented Research (Jan 28, 2016) http://www.cihr-irsc.gc.ca/e/41204.html
16. Government of Canada. Canadian Institutes of Health. Research Pain BC partners in launching national pain research network March 31, 2016 https://www.painbc.ca/news/pain-bc-partners-launching-national-painresearch-network
18. Government of Canada. Canadian Institutes of Health. U of T news. U of T researchers to investigate environment’s health impact April 29, 2016. https://www.utoronto.ca/news/u-t-researchers-investigateenvironment-health-impact